Edwards told me that the allegations were not true.
He said The N&O was the paper that arrived on his doorstep every day, the one read by friends of him and his wife, Elizabeth.
He said he'd never called before to complain or state his case. Given Elizabeth's health -- she has cancer -- he said it was especially important to him that the story not run in The N&O.
Read the whole column here.
Fortunately, somebody kept after the story until it got the story. Unfortunately, that somebody was not the N&O.
ReplyDeletein the N&O's defense it's hard to keep your eye on the ball when every couple of days you lose a member of the team. that combined with more staff cuts coming AND a salary freeze....well mcclatchy will get what they paid for... diminished returns and less breaking the big story epics. reporters are peddling as fast as they can but it's all uphill with the current marching orders from (mis)management. the real story which mcclatchy papers should be working on is how wonder boy gary pruett in one fell swoop has destroyed a once proud and profitable newspaper entity. I'd like to read that......
ReplyDeleteThe ball was being dropped before the cuts started happening.
ReplyDeleteHoward, can't you ban that guy? The obnoxious, all lower case guy who can't punctuate, spells Pruitt "Pruett" and hates McClatchy. The rest of us are not uniformly thrilled with you or what's happening with our newspapers. But we're on the same team as you, and we have a lot at stake. Lower Case Guy is just a twerp.
ReplyDeleteWell, whatever.
Old joke: How do you know when a politician is lying? His lips move.
the truth is out there and it's in lower case. hey maybe I like spelling the great bumbler's name wrong. lighten up
ReplyDeleteWell, you banned John Edwards' story...might as well ban it all. Look, nobody blames your paper for having a heart when Edwards asked you to back off. You got lied to. Now, if Edwards broke any laws, then you can redeem yourself. Just follow the money.
ReplyDeleteI’ve often heard various folks comment on how wonderfully varied, complex and diverse the English language is, effortlessly welcoming foreign words and phrases ‘into the fold’. The depth of our language is sometimes described as a ‘bottomless reservoir’ of nuance.
ReplyDeleteI agreed with that sentiment, but no longer, thanks to John Edwards. I’ve been struggling the last two weeks for words to describe exactly how much of a douchebag he really is. And sadly, for the first time I find my native tongue wanting. The adjectives simply aren’t ‘there’ to accurately describe how much of a manipulative, calculating, reprehensible, scumbag, liar, phony, narcissistic, empty-suit, jackass he really is.
See that? My best effort to ‘capture’ the fundamental essence of John Edwards rings completely hollow, like calling the Grand Canyon a ‘really big ravine’. I would otherwise be embarrassed by my linguistic impotence, but I really don’t think it’s my fault. He has simply re-defined the boundaries of douche-baggery, shattering the power of words to define him. It is, in wierd sort of way, a mark of greatness. A legacy, if you will.
On another topic, how about Anchorage's rooting out of Ted Steven's corruption! Good thing they got him out of there 20 years ago when they had that can-do editor up there. Oh, wait ...
ReplyDelete"If your mother says she loves you, check it out."
ReplyDeleteDidn't that come up in Journalism 101 in school?
Anom1120...that guy from Anchorage is on life support.......brain death is a horrible thing.
ReplyDeleteHoward, please read this. It explains everything you guys are doing WRONG. Thanks.
ReplyDeletePS: Please forward to Gary.
EUROPEAN NEWSPAPERS THRIVING ON QUALITY, INNOVATION
1080&add. Moving in international and financial categories.
By SHELLEY EMLING
Cox News Service
LONDON — Punchier headlines. Shorter stories. Bigger photos. None of them have stilled the death knell for U.S. newspapers.
With readers migrating to the Web and ad revenue failing to keep up with the shift, American editors might look across the Atlantic for tips on how to stave off their demise.
London, for example, is bursting with several thriving competitors, boasting at least five serious newspapers and four tabloids. In Berlin, Europe’s largest paper, Bild, reported its most profitable year yet in 2007.
Experts say European papers are prospering largely because they haven’t followed the U.S. path of draconian — and self-defeating — cuts in scope and quality of coverage.
“It’s a mystery to me why (U.S.) publishers think people will pay more for less, especially when the online world offers so many alternatives,” said George Kennedy, a professor emeritus at the University of Missouri School of Journalism who spent the summer in London. “It’s no accident that U.S. readership of the Economist, the Guardian, and the Times has gone up as their American competitors have cut back staff, pages, and ambition.”
But some experts say European newspaper companies have also been more willing to experiment with new technologies, news and advertising formats, and promotions, and their innovations are paying off in continued readership.
Perhaps the most important factor in the success of European newspapers is their effectiveness at guiding readers to their Web sites.
According to the Newspaper Association of America, Web sites of U.S. papers attracted an average of 65.4 million monthly visitors in June. By comparison, the Newspaper Marketing Agency in the much smaller United Kingdom reported that in June, the Web sites of six large national newspapers drew 94.8 million visitors.
The Paris-based World Association of Newspapers reported this year that European online revenues are forecast to more than double in the next five years, and will account for 12 percent of total newspaper advertising by 2011.
Susan Kremers, owner of Newspaper Consulting Services, a Minneapolis-based company that advises publishers on how to make use of the Internet, said she has repeatedly urged U.S. newspapers to embrace the opportunities provided by an online edition.
Too often American publishers have underinvested in the Web, she said, still choosing to view it as supplemental to the print version.
Kremers said that U.S. papers could do much more in the area of creating expanded local content like breaking news, weather, archives, video, blogs, photo galleries, and polling options.“
European newspapers ‘’had the benefit of learning from U.S. mistakes,“ she said. When U.S. newspapers were creating online editions in the late 1990s, she said, ‘’we were still unsure where the Web would take us.? Fearing loss of subscribers, many newspapers resisted putting their content online.?Those that embraced it as an alternate source to get their news out, didn’t have the luxury of knowing how many additional opportunities that technology would create.“
Kremers said that European newspapers also make better use of digital technology.
In a partnership between Bild and Vodafone, readers who want to find out more about a Bild article simply photograph it with their cell phone camera and send the photo to 4242. This gives them direct access to additional multimedia content such as photos or videos on their cell phone.
According to the Newspaper Association of America, total daily newspaper circulation nationwide fell from an all-time high of 62.6 million in 1990 to 53.1 million in 2006.
For the six-month period ending in March, all but two of the nation’s top 20 newspapers reported decreases in circulation. Only the Wall Street Journal and USA Today posted increases — both less than 1 percent.
Revenues have suffered as well. U.S. papers have been especially hard hit by a decline in print classified advertising, much of which has migrated to free Web sites. U.S. papers also are being hurt by skyrocketing newsprint costs, rising fuel costs, and deep declines in real estate and automotive advertising — two areas of the economy that are suffering badly.
While U.S. newspapers depend on advertising for about 75 percent of their revenues, in Europe the figure is 50 percent or less, according to Chris Kubas, of Kubas Consultants. But the trend may be shifting, according to the World Association of Newspapers. The group found that over the past five years, the growth of ad-supported free dailies has more than offset a fall in paid circulation, with the result that total free and paid circulation has increased 9.61 percent in the European Union.
Some papers saw success after modifying their shape.
Five years after launching a tabloid format, London’s Independent was selling 30,000 copies a day more than its broadsheet predecessor, although it has struggled over the past year.
The Times, too, posted gains in sales after switching to a tabloid format in November 2004 following more than 200 years as a broadsheet.
Mario Garcia, whose Florida-based Garcia Media helps redesign newspapers around the world, believes there are a number of reasons why U.S. newspapers are struggling.
One is an unhealthy dependency on focus groups.
‘’Many times an innovative concept is shut down by readers who simply are not used to it and therefore dismiss it as foreign to them,“ he said. ‘’I definitely find that editors outside of the U.S. are more likely to let gut feeling, their nose, their eyes, or just a sense of street savvy, help them make decisions when it comes to introducing new concepts.“
Garcia also said U.S. editors haven’t been innovative enough when it comes to presenting advertising.
At many papers, such ideas as ‘’sponsorship ads for the weather or TV listings is seen as intruding into the landscape of the editorial integrity of the paper,“ he said.
In addition, Garcia said, European newspapers often package the sales of ads for cell phones, print pages, and online sites, an initiative not happening widely at American newspapers.
Kennedy, the Missouri professor, also noted that British papers market themselves much more aggressively than American papers.
London’s Sun tabloid recently ran a promotion targeted at upscale Londoners giving them the chance to buy opera tickets at greatly discounted prices. The result? When Mozart’s ‘’Don Giovanni“ premieres next month at the Royal Opera House, all 2,200 seats will be packed with Sun readers.
‘’The years of effective local monopoly seem to have sucked out of American papers most of their aggressiveness of imagination when it comes to selling themselves to either readers or advertisers, Kennedy said.
(Optional add follows)
Central Michigan University journalism professor John Hartman said he believes U.S. papers should be free in order to attract more readers.
“But publishers are reluctant to give up 20 to 25 percent of their revenue,” he said.
Hartman said a different kind of marketplace also has benefited European papers.
“Europeans simply are more literate and more contemplative than we are, and less infested with video worship,” Hartman said.