tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3039863.post2526924760628819677..comments2023-10-24T01:17:35.297-07:00Comments on Etaoin Shrdlu: Nielsen numbers reported by Nieman don't support dire conclusionsHowardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08379598516764590842noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3039863.post-2912211174630520662009-08-07T06:37:31.989-07:002009-08-07T06:37:31.989-07:00I think both contexts are valuable. The time spent...I think both contexts are valuable. The time spent with news sites in relation to total time spent online is certainly valuable. The less time people are spending with us, the less likely they will value that time and choose to pay for it and the less valuable their attention is to our business partners. It's also relevant that nearly all of those other places are free. <br /><br />Yes, a Steve Buttryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07638471876968133906noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3039863.post-66260878686097092652009-08-06T10:03:35.295-07:002009-08-06T10:03:35.295-07:00Find Martin's thoughtful response at http://ww...Find Martin's thoughtful response at http://www.niemanlab.org/<br /><br />As I mentioned, I think his take on the Nielsen measures *is* important and ought to be paid attention to. But I don't think it's anything like the indictment many have taken it to be.<br /><br />I believe his would have been a stronger post initially if it included the context and nuance provided in his Howardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08379598516764590842noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3039863.post-63074323739606742822009-08-06T09:50:57.155-07:002009-08-06T09:50:57.155-07:00Thanks Howard - I've responded over at NiemanThanks Howard - I've responded over at NiemanMartin Langeveldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05745134335677178737noreply@blogger.com